The Disappointing Downturn of Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria

Foreign Direct Investment

Photo illustration by Dami Mojid for THE REPUBLIC.

the ministry of business x the economy

The Disappointing Downturn of Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria

Nigeria, once Africa’s top foreign investment destination, has fallen from grace. Is there a way forward?
Foreign Direct Investment

Photo illustration by Dami Mojid for THE REPUBLIC.

the ministry of business x the economy

The Disappointing Downturn of Foreign Direct Investment in Nigeria

Nigeria, once Africa’s top foreign investment destination, has fallen from grace. Is there a way forward?

The scene is set: the year is 2011, the country is Nigeria and it has just received $8.4 billion in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), an all-time high. In the same year, the ‘Giant of Africa’ recorded a 2.9 per cent drop in inflation and a whopping $414.5 billion in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a 13 per cent increase from the $367 billion achieved in 2010. This comes as no surprise, after all with increased FDI comes job creation, economic growth and knowledge sharing. FDI is critical in Nigeria, as foreign investment is a major source of forex inflow. Furthermore, FDI is an economic indicator that signifies faith not just in the Nigerian economy but also in the Nigerian people. 

Fast forward to 2024 and the situation has drastically changed. Nigeria has recorded a steady decline in FDI over the past two years. This has had a significant effect on the populace. Following the exit of pharmaceutical giant, GlaxoSmithKline in 2023, drug prices rose by 900 per cent. To top it off, the country is being overlooked for investment in favour of other African countries, even those with a lower GDP. For instance, Kenya was recently announced as the site of a $1 billion geothermal-powered data centre to be built by Microsoft and G42. The Nigerian government is scrambling to steady the exchange rates, whilst inflation is rising. What’s worse is that the government’s policies aimed at easing the crisis have not yielded significant results. The country that received the highest FDI inflow on the continent in 1997, now seems to repel it. 

UNDERSTANDING THE CAUSE OF REDUCED FDI INFLOW

Through all this, the question on everyone’s lips is ‘Why? Why is FDI on the decline?’ The obvious answer for some would be that all of Africa has experienced a decline in foreign investment. Hence, it is unsurprising that Nigeria’s FDI inflow has declined. Perhaps investors no longer see the promise and potential they once saw in Africa. However, I disagree with this school of thought. Nigeria is not only witnessing a decline in foreign investment, but it is also experiencing an exodus of foreign investors. For example, Procter & Gamble, a multinational consumer goods company and producer of household brands including Pampers and Tampax exited Nigeria in 2023. This mass exodus is indicative of a growing unwillingness to invest in Nigeria. In my opinion, the answer to the cause of the FDI decline and the exit of multiple foreign companies can be summed up into one word: risk.  

The concept of risk and reward is the very heart and soul of investment. The basis for the assessment of risk is simple. It is based on the probability that the investment will yield or fail to yield the expected profit or any profit at all. Where the risk is too high, risk-averse investors are less willing to participate, even where there is a high potential for reward. There are two forms of risk that investors consider: market risk and business risk. 

Market risk stems from the effect of external factors on the entire financial market. Some of the factors affecting market risk in Nigeria are insecurity, legal uncertainty of regulations and policies, and corruption.  

The market risk for investors and entrepreneurs within Nigeria is exaggerated. The Central Bank of Nigeria has, this year alone, increased interest rates three times. The federal and state governments have often unexpectedly enacted policies that affect business activities in their jurisdictions, without adequately conferring with stakeholders, leaving them with little recourse to legal action. The example of the Lagos State partial ban of commercial motorcycles, (okadas), in February 2020 readily comes to mind. The transportation service providers affected included Gokada, a company co-founded by a Bangladeshi-American national that had managed to raise $5.3 million from local and foreign investors only a year before. The okada ban forced the company to dismiss 50 per cent of its workforce and venture into logistics. Moreover, in 2023, the Corporate Affairs Commission released a notice increasing the minimum paid-up share capital for companies with foreign participation from 10 million to 100 million, with a six-month compliance deadline which was then withdrawn less than a week later. These events demonstrate instability, and the lack of regulatory transparency further complicates risk assessment for foreign investors.  

With transparency comes predictability. It is this predictability that allows investors to make informed decisions based on market trends. Unfortunately, transparency and predictability are not immediately synonymous with Nigeria. In 2023, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu announced the removal of fuel subsidy which changed the landscape of doing business in Nigeria. The changes included inflation and an increase in the cost of transportation and power generation. Factors such as additional regulation on foreign investment, currency volatility, transaction fees, taxes and costs payable when transacting across borders lead to increased risk for foreign investors. 

Business risks are the factors that may result in lowered profits or failure of business operations, and include competition, financing, human capital and product production. Following news that Nestle, Guinness and other businesses collectively lost 900 billion in 2023, it is unsurprising that major corporations continue to divest or exit Nigeria entirely. Despite investing a whopping $100 million in Nigeria only three years ago, Kimberly-Clark a multinational company which birthed brands including Huggies and Kotex, in its official press release published in May 2024, announced plans to exit Nigeria partly due to ‘economic developments in the country.’ The company’s operational costs were reportedly more than 500 million per month despite operating at a lower capacity, which rendered the business unprofitable. In addition to the jobs lost, the company’s exit marks a setback to the improvement of menstrual healthcare in Nigeria. The losses incurred by these companies are a significant threat to their ability to carry on with business operations. This is business risk come to life. 

Andre Schulten, the chief financial officer of Procter & Gamble, attributed the company’s exit from Nigeria to the difficulty for a dollar-denominated company to create value in Nigeria and operate within its macroeconomic environment. In a similar vein, Nestlé reported a loss of over 100 billion before tax in 2023, with the company noting that ‘despite the strong operational performance, the net profit is impacted by significant devaluation of the naira.’ Both instances demonstrate the business risks that Nigeria’s economic climate has exposed investors to. 

As the saying goes, ‘return of investment is more important than return on investment.’ In other words, loss of potential earnings is bad, but loss of the capital invested is even worse. Applied to Nigeria’s current economic climate, there is a high risk of investors losing their initial capital investment, which discourages foreign investors who make decisions based on a risk-reward analysis. As reported in the 2019-2020 Global Investment Competitiveness Report, reducing risk is a key strategy for governments to attract investment. 

shop the republic

shop the republic

SOLVING NIGERIA’S FDI PROBLEM

So, what’s the fix? Unlike the question, the answer is not easily so summed up. In an African Development Bank (AfDB) 2011 working paper, economist, John C. Anyanwu, identified the determinants of FDI inflow into Africa based on decades of data collection between 1980-2007. He concluded that the presence of determinants such as market size, trade openness, financial development, macroeconomic stability, exchange rates, infrastructure and natural resource endowment and exploitation, indicate a safer risk environment. These factors have been adopted as the basis for assessing how Nigeria can improve its business environment and attract FDI.  

On the matter of market size, with an estimated population of over 200 million people, accounting for 2.5 per cent of the world’s population, there is no doubt that Nigeria provides foreign investors with a vast and diverse market. The country’s large population does not only provide a wide market of consumers, but it also provides a large labour market. On the face of it, this factor is very easily satisfied. However, it is possible that investors seek quality and not simply quantity when considering market size. Anyanwu identifies the urban population as the ‘key market size’ and stresses that African countries with a higher urban population attract more FDI. A 1999 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development report titled Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: Performance and Potential noted that efforts to improve the education levels of citizens played an important role in attracting FDI. While Nigeria is the most populous African nation, it is also the continent’s poverty capital—accounting for the second largest population of poor people globally in 2023. In 2023, Nigeria’s urban population was a mere 54 per cent of its total population, which may not be attractive enough for foreign investors. This can be compared to Namibia, the country that beat Nigeria to seventh place in the list of African countries with the highest FDI inflow, with its 55 per cent urban population. Thus, to benefit from its population, the Nigerian government needs to enact and effectively implement policies aimed at alleviating poverty.  

Unlike Nigeria’s market size, its willingness to trade is not a factor that investors will be easily convinced of. In 2019, Nigeria partially and then subsequently closed all of its land borders to trade. This decision not only stifled trade but was also seen by many as an exaggerated response to the government’s frustration at the smuggled imports of rice and illicit exports of locally subsidized petroleum to neighbouring countries. The borders were later reopened in 2021, following the ratification of the Africa Continental Free Trade Area Agreement. To demonstrate Nigeria’s willingness to trade and attract FDI, it must start with neighbouring countries by taking advantage of its membership in economic communities.  

Interestingly, Anyanwu observed a negative relationship between financial development and FDI inflow in Africa. According to his AfDB study, low financial sector development is a strong predictor of FDI inflows to African countries. However, he does warn against this, stating that strong financial domestic systems are essential. To allow for smooth transactions, there is a need for working systems which investors can exploit. Anyanwu notes that ‘new 

banking technologies that can expedite check clearance, reduce exchange losses, and improve disclosure, especially in rural areas in developing countries, can be particularly helpful.’ Thus, Nigeria’s strong banking and finance regulations indicate a step towards achieving sound domestic systems.  

Natural resource endowment is another of Nigeria’s strengths. Nigeria is rich in many natural resources, the most popular one for FDI attraction being petroleum. The country can boast of various metals including gold, coal, tin and limestone scattered across all 36 states. Although well-endowed with resources, and despite many efforts, Nigeria has been unable to fully harness their benefits. For instance, Nigeria has an estimated 42 billion tonnes of bitumen deposits. Yet, Nigeria continues to import most of the bitumen used for road construction. In comparison, in 2022, Turkey exported $261 million worth of bitumen and asphalt, demonstrating Nigeria’s revenue potential. While FDI will assist in the exploration and exploitation efforts, Nigeria must invest in the exploration of resources other than petroleum in order to attract FDI.  

The macroeconomic and exchange rate instability over the past few months have made it all too evident that Nigeria cannot count macroeconomic stability as its strength. Food inflation was 40.66 per cent as of May 2024. Exchange rate volatility and forex scarcity have also been a growing concern. Unless these are stabilized, Nigeria must part with the idea of securing foreign investment. 

shop the republic

shop the republic

THE WAY FORWARD

For Nigeria to revive FDI inflow, it must level up through fiscal and monetary policies. In 2023, Nigeria passed the Business Facilitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act which amended multiple pieces of legislation—intending to ease business dealings. For instance, the act amends the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 to extend the list of exemptions for the incorporation of foreign companies. It also made amendments to the National Housing Fund Act, such that contributions from private sector employees are no longer mandatory. These seemingly minor legislative changes translate to a more friendly business climate for Nigerians and foreigners alike. This is a step in the right direction and demonstrates a willingness from the Nigerian government to improve the economic climate in the country and attract foreign investment.  

In addition to legislation, the government must continue to create a low-risk climate for investors. A major factor in this would be in reducing business costs by improving the power sector. Nigeria’s power supply issues have been cited as a hindrance to business operations as they drive up the cost of production. Before its exit, Kimberly Clarke reportedly spent 100 million monthly on power generation. It must be said, though, that while seeking increased FDI inflows, the Nigerian government must work towards creating a balance between raising foreign investment and protecting domestic interests

shop the republic

BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER