The Problem With a US Military Base in Nigeria

Military

Collage by Dami Mojid / THE REPUBLIC. Ref: HARANDANE DICKO / UN PHOTO.

THE MINISTRY OF POLITICAL AFFAIRS / SECURITY DESK

The Problem With a US Military Base in Nigeria

As a regional military powerhouse, Nigeria is an ideal location for a US military base. However, establishing a foreign military base in Nigeria could reinforce neo-colonial dynamics and compromise Nigeria’s sovereignty.
Military

Collage by Dami Mojid / THE REPUBLIC. Ref: HARANDANE DICKO / UN PHOTO.

THE MINISTRY OF POLITICAL AFFAIRS / SECURITY DESK

The Problem With a US Military Base in Nigeria

As a regional military powerhouse, Nigeria is an ideal location for a US military base. However, establishing a foreign military base in Nigeria could reinforce neo-colonial dynamics and compromise Nigeria’s sovereignty.

The Sahel, a vast swathe of semi-arid land south of the Sahara desert, has become a breeding ground for violent extremism in recent years. Insurgent groups like Boko Haram, Islamic State Sahel Province (IS Sahel)—formerly known as Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS)—and Jama’at Nusrat al-Islam wal Muslimeen (JNIM), capitalizing on poverty, weak governance and ethnic tensions, have established a foothold across the region. These groups, along with Islamic State in the West African Province (ISWAP) and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), have launched brutal attacks on civilians and security forces, destabilizing countries like Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger. Despite regional counterinsurgency efforts by the G5 Sahel Joint Force and the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF), these countries remain under siege. The situation worsened with military coups in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger between 2021 and 2023, further crippling regional cooperation to combat extremist groups. 

The subsequent withdrawal of the United States troops from Niger in April 2024, due to strained relations, leaves a gap in regional counterterrorism efforts and raises questions about the future of US military presence in the Sahel. Nigeria, as a regional powerhouse with a sizable military, is an ideal alternative location for a base. However, the establishment of a foreign military base in Nigeria could reinforce neo-colonial dynamics, compromise Nigeria’s sovereignty, and create long-term dependencies that could weaken the country’s ability to manage its own security. 

In a WhatsApp interview with Adebayo Adeleke, a retired US major and an African security and supply chain expert, he pointed out that a US military base is unnecessary in Nigeria. Echoing his perspective, Nigeria and other African nations should not rely on external military presence. Instead, they need to pursue an independent foreign policy that prioritizes regional leadership and self-reliance, thereby strengthening their security and enhancing their counterinsurgency capabilities. 

THE CONFLICTING LEGACY OF FOREIGN MILITARY BASES IN AFRICA

The presence of foreign military bases in Africa is not a new phenomenon. Russia, the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Turkey, China, India and several other non-African countries have military presence in Africa, including bases. Until the French military was recently expelled from former colonies such as Niger, France and Britain used their colonial ties to ease base establishment in African countries. Despite not having colonial ties to the continent, the US has established 29 bases in 15 African countries or territories. Meanwhile, China and India are expanding their African military presence. 

Military base installations in Africa include land-based facilities such as bases, ports, airstrips, training camps, semi-permanent facilities and logistics hubs. Security, strategic and economic considerations have historically motivated the establishment of foreign military bases on the continent. During our discussion, Adeleke stated that US military bases are often strategic in nature with the major one being in Djibouti, while the rest are temporary bases that usually belong to the host countries. 

Nonetheless, the consequences of African countries hosting foreign military bases are complex, with an often-contradictory narrative. While some bases have demonstrably bolstered regional security like France’s military intervention in Mali in 2013, which temporarily pushed back militant groups in the Sahel region—almost a decade before the same French forces were forced to leave the region in 2022 due to growing dissatisfaction and strained tensions—other foreign military bases have become flashpoints for tension and instability. Case in point: the recent expulsion of French troops from Burkina Faso and Niger in 2023, amid accusations of neo-colonial interference and limited effectiveness in combating extremism.  

shop the republic

shop the republic

FOREIGN MILITARY PRESENCE ON THE CONTINENT: EMPOWERING OR A NEW SCRAMBLE FOR AFRICA?

In 2016, the African Union’s (AU) Peace and Security Council (PSC) expressed concerns over the proliferation of foreign military bases on the continent and the inability of African governments to trace the movement of weapons in these military bases. The PSC urged member states to be circumspect when entering into agreements that would lead to the establishment of foreign military bases in their countries. This stance reflects African governments’ growing awareness of the potential implications of hosting foreign military forces. 

The Horn of Africa has become a strategic focal point. It hosts the military bases of France, the US, China, Japan, the UAE and Turkey due to its proximity to the Middle East and Asia, and the subsequent security challenges in the Red Sea. A 2019 Institute of Security Studies (ISS) report revealed that France had an estimated 7,550 military personnel deployed across Africa, while the US maintains a more extensive network with 34 known outposts. 

Security concerns have played a major role in situating foreign military bases in Africa. Nations facing regional instability, terrorism, kidnapping for ransom and internal conflicts see the military bases as a way to bolster their own security capabilities and counterinsurgency efforts. The US drone strikes in Somalia have contributed to reducing al-Shabaab’s influence, creating space for peacebuilding efforts. Similarly, French troops have played a role in capacity building for national armies and pushing back jihadist groups in the Sahel. However, the overall impact of these foreign military interventions remains contested. 

The proliferation of small arms and light weapons in Africa worsened Africa’s security landscape and created opportunities for foreign military intervention. The Sahel region, in particular, has been destabilized by the illicit trade of these weapons, fueling conflicts and empowering non-state actors. A 2022 United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC) report found evidence of firearms trafficking to the Sahel, with the vast majority of the weapons procured within Africa. The region’s proximity to Libya, where the collapse of Muammar Gaddafi’s regime led to the rapid increase in the number of weapons in circulation further compounded the issue. 

Strategic and economic considerations have also brought foreign military presence to Africa’s doorstep. A 2019 report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) revealed an ongoing competition for influence and access to African resources and routes among countries outside the region has led to the growing number of these military bases. Countries like Djibouti have leveraged their geographic location to the Red Sea to generate substantial revenue, earning over $300 million annually from hosting foreign military forces.  

Africa’s vast natural resources, particularly oil and minerals, coupled with its position at the crossroads of key trade routes in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, also give it significant geopolitical and economic importance. The economic capital, and the resulting incentive from partnering with foreign powers, has driven many African nations into leasing their territory to these non-African countries. However, the presence of foreign military bases raises complex questions about African sovereignty and the potential for external interference in domestic affairs. 

shop the republic

shop the republic

NIGERIA’S STANCE AND ITS SECURITY CHALLENGES

As Africa’s most populous nation with a substantial military, Nigeria is a strategically appealing location for counterterrorism operations within the Sahel region. Nigeria, however, has a history of rejecting foreign military base proposals. 

A former minister of foreign affairs of Nigeria, Bolaji Akinyemi, emphasized this stance recalling: ‘Afterall, when we turned down the British base in 1960, our relationship did not come crashing down. It continued.’ With regards to a US military base and the enduring cordial relationship between the two nations, Akinyemi noted that: ‘This is not the first time that Nigeria and the United States would have a conversation on this issue of having a military base.’ He further explained, ‘There was a time when the United States raised this issue of having a West African base . . . Nigeria turned down the proposal.’ The recent rumors of a potential US or French military base in Nigeria have also been swiftly debunked, reaffirming across different administrations, Nigeria’s long-standing cautiousness and stance against such foreign installations. 

Nevertheless, over the years, the Nigerian military has engaged in numerous joint military exercises and training programs with foreign partners, including the US, the UK, the Netherlands, Spain and Italy. The Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) program, a US collaborative military training initiative that Nigeria occasionally participates in, exemplifies this cooperation. Adeleke, while speaking on this revealed he was a participant in an earlier JCET in 2008, stating that there was no US base in Nigeria at that time but US personnel were accommodated in Nigerian military facilities. 

Despite the Nigerian military’s efforts to combat insurgency and violent extremism, the country faces significant challenges. Its diverse ethnic and religious composition fuels tensions and conflicts in certain regions, while groups like Boko Haram and ISWAP continue to perpetrate attacks on civilians and security forces. The humanitarian crisis resulting from this violence, with over 3.3 million displaced persons last year, is compounded by armed banditry and kidnapping. Additionally, underlying economic factors continue to worsen the security situation. 

Given these complex security and economic challenges, any decision to establish a US military base in Nigeria requires careful consideration of potential benefits and risks. As Adeleke pointed out: ‘The polity is not in dire need of a foreign military base. All they [Nigerian military] need is more training and more capacity building assistance to enhance their counterterrorism capabilities, which the US has been working with Nigeria for so long to provide.’ 

shop the republic

shop the republic

WHY NIGERIA MUST REJECT A US MILITARY BASE

Insecurity in Africa is fundamentally driven by several deep-seated issues. Weak governance is a significant factor in the ongoing conflict and instability plaguing African nations. Adeleke explained that ‘the institution that is currently in Nigeria is fragile’. Additionally, the porous borders across West Africa facilitate the movement of terrorist groups and illicit goods, exacerbating the security situation. 

On 11 July 2024, a jailbreak occurred in Niger at Koutoukale prison, which houses numerous jihadist insurgents who have targeted the West African nation for years. Koutoukale prison is located in the Tillaberi region, a vast and unstable border area linking Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso. The region is prone to attacks by rebels with connections to the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) and al-Qaeda. Adeleke, commenting on the jailbreak, noted that ‘there are enablers inside and outside these [government] institutions, which indicates severe systemic weaknesses, and escaped jihadists pose a significant threat to neighboring countries like Niger and Chad’. It goes without saying that incidents like this reveal the delicate and deteriorating security situation in the Sahel region and West Africa. 

While the temptation to allow a US military base in Nigeria may stem from the aforesaid security concerns, the long-term consequences of such a decision could be detrimental to Nigeria’s sovereignty and stability. The historical and operational context of foreign military bases in Africa reveals a pattern of neo-colonial influence, economic disruption, and potential civil unrest. The presence of a US military base in Nigeria could also inflame anti-Western sentiments, lead to civilian casualties, and create dependencies that could compromise Nigeria’s ability to govern and secure itself independently. 

Adeleke agrees that situating a US military base in Nigeria or elsewhere in Africa is not a panacea for the region’s security problems, citing the historical and operational contexts of the French in its former colonies. Instead, he advocates for using soft power and strategic partnerships to mitigate security risks in the Sahel region. The retired US major further explained that the US military typically creates its own supply chains, which can disrupt local systems. This self-sufficient approach may bypass local economies and create unsustainable dependencies, potentially fostering resentment among local populations who may view it as economic exclusion or neo-colonialism. He emphasized that the US military’s need to control its supply chain in a ‘contested environment’ like Africa makes establishing a base problematic. The complex geopolitical landscape, with multiple foreign interests, complicates ensuring a seamless and secure supply line. 

If we look deeper, there is a more sustainable solution that could mitigate Africa’s security challenges. Adeleke stressed the importance of ‘more training and more capacity building assistance’ for African security forces rather than establishing permanent foreign military bases. Intensifying the training to enhance the capabilities of local forces through joint programs and continuous support would be more effective in the long term. 

By rejecting the establishment of a US military base, Nigeria can reaffirm its commitment to African autonomy and leadership. Strengthening domestic security institutions, investing in economic development and fostering regional alliances are the paths to a secure and self-reliant Nigeria. In the long run, these efforts will enable Nigeria to not only secure its borders but also lead the continent in establishing peace and stability in the Sahel region without external military dependence

BUY THE MAGAZINE AND/OR THE COVER